<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Live Maps and the API</title>
	<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: maps &#187; Microsoft Live Maps and the API</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4721</link>
		<author>maps &#187; Microsoft Live Maps and the API</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4721</guid>
					<description>[...] brh wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost websites we see that have maps embedded use Google maps (and some unfortunate ones still use MapQuest), and it works pretty darn well. However, I recently started working with Microsoft Live maps(also called Microsoft MapPoint) &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] brh wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost websites we see that have maps embedded use Google maps (and some unfortunate ones still use MapQuest), and it works pretty darn well. However, I recently started working with Microsoft Live maps(also called Microsoft MapPoint) &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fires &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Live Maps and the API</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4722</link>
		<author>fires &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Live Maps and the API</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4722</guid>
					<description>[...] brh wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost websites we see that have maps embedded use Google maps (and some unfortunate ones still use MapQuest), and it works pretty darn well. However, I recently started working with Microsoft Live maps(also called Microsoft MapPoint) &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] brh wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost websites we see that have maps embedded use Google maps (and some unfortunate ones still use MapQuest), and it works pretty darn well. However, I recently started working with Microsoft Live maps(also called Microsoft MapPoint) &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apparel &#187; Microsoft Live Maps and the API</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4725</link>
		<author>apparel &#187; Microsoft Live Maps and the API</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4725</guid>
					<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost websites we see that have maps embedded use Google maps (and some unfortunate ones still use MapQuest), and it works pretty darn well. However, I recently started working with Microsoft Live maps(also called Microsoft MapPoint) &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost websites we see that have maps embedded use Google maps (and some unfortunate ones still use MapQuest), and it works pretty darn well. However, I recently started working with Microsoft Live maps(also called Microsoft MapPoint) &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Drach</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4734</link>
		<author>Nathan Drach</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4734</guid>
					<description>I went to a DOTNET usergroup the other day that had this as the topic.  I have to say I was very impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to a DOTNET usergroup the other day that had this as the topic.  I have to say I was very impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4792</link>
		<author>Scot Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4792</guid>
					<description>That's an interesting viewpoint.  I didn't know Microsoft had their maps open as well.  Thanks.

-- Scot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting viewpoint.  I didn&#8217;t know Microsoft had their maps open as well.  Thanks.</p>
<p>&#8211; Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kee</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4842</link>
		<author>Jeff Kee</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/04/17/microsoft-live-maps-and-the-api/#comment-4842</guid>
					<description>Microsoft maps are even more open and accessible than Google's maps. It's much easier to program and use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft maps are even more open and accessible than Google&#8217;s maps. It&#8217;s much easier to program and use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
