<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Vancouver Olympics, and the two faces of the city</title>
	<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Lemuel Jopio (PPP still RULES!)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2348</link>
		<author>Lemuel Jopio (PPP still RULES!)</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2348</guid>
					<description>A very good blog entry Jeff.  Even though I don't see eye-to-eye with your point of view, It's still a refreshing read about Vancouver Politics and Social inequalities prevalent in the world around us. 

Yes, there will never be a single solution to poverty or social injustices that we see on a daily basis.  But one thing remains true, our governmental institutions will always cater to the political class ( aka. the rich) and will continue to do so in the foreseeable future.  As we all know, this practice has been ongoing since the formation of our modern day economies. 

(I suggest that you read the book "Understanding Power" by Noam Chomsky).

Education remains a key factor if you want to help change the world.  If people can see beyond the smoke and mirrors presented by mainstream media outlets (MEGA-CORPORATIONS) or western forms of propaganda,  we can all make a difference.  It may not happen today or tomorrow, but as history has shown, empires and systems inevitably crumble, only to be replaced by something new or, hopefully, more progressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good blog entry Jeff.  Even though I don&#8217;t see eye-to-eye with your point of view, It&#8217;s still a refreshing read about Vancouver Politics and Social inequalities prevalent in the world around us. </p>
<p>Yes, there will never be a single solution to poverty or social injustices that we see on a daily basis.  But one thing remains true, our governmental institutions will always cater to the political class ( aka. the rich) and will continue to do so in the foreseeable future.  As we all know, this practice has been ongoing since the formation of our modern day economies. </p>
<p>(I suggest that you read the book &#8220;Understanding Power&#8221; by Noam Chomsky).</p>
<p>Education remains a key factor if you want to help change the world.  If people can see beyond the smoke and mirrors presented by mainstream media outlets (MEGA-CORPORATIONS) or western forms of propaganda,  we can all make a difference.  It may not happen today or tomorrow, but as history has shown, empires and systems inevitably crumble, only to be replaced by something new or, hopefully, more progressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kee</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2349</link>
		<author>Jeff Kee</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2349</guid>
					<description>Appreciate the comments Lem. 

My opinions are generally a bit radical - but we need both sides to pull on an issue. I'm never too neutral or too much of a softie when it comes to political issues. 

Politics in Canada, in my opinion, still have a decent balance. There's of course the influence from the rich that put lobbying pressure on the government, but there's also the masses that need to be satisfied - to be elected you need to win the heart of not-so-rich people as well so there is always a compromise made. That's more than enough catering for "those" people, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the comments Lem. </p>
<p>My opinions are generally a bit radical - but we need both sides to pull on an issue. I&#8217;m never too neutral or too much of a softie when it comes to political issues. </p>
<p>Politics in Canada, in my opinion, still have a decent balance. There&#8217;s of course the influence from the rich that put lobbying pressure on the government, but there&#8217;s also the masses that need to be satisfied - to be elected you need to win the heart of not-so-rich people as well so there is always a compromise made. That&#8217;s more than enough catering for &#8220;those&#8221; people, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Orr</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2389</link>
		<author>Sean Orr</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2389</guid>
					<description>Your Cancer patient analogy could also be use to describe the Olympics. I guess I don't see a difference between Social Welfare and Corporate Welfare, where you abhor one while support the latter. If the Olympics want so bad to come to Vancouver, they should pay for it themselves. After all, you know what its like to overcome adversity by hard work and perseverance, don't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Cancer patient analogy could also be use to describe the Olympics. I guess I don&#8217;t see a difference between Social Welfare and Corporate Welfare, where you abhor one while support the latter. If the Olympics want so bad to come to Vancouver, they should pay for it themselves. After all, you know what its like to overcome adversity by hard work and perseverance, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kee</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2433</link>
		<author>Jeff Kee</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2433</guid>
					<description>Corporate Welfare? No such thing. 

It's just rewarding the deserving. Money makes money, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporate Welfare? No such thing. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just rewarding the deserving. Money makes money, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olympics &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Former Game Rivals Team Up for Olympics</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2435</link>
		<author>Olympics &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Former Game Rivals Team Up for Olympics</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2435</guid>
					<description>[...] It s been a few years since the 2010 Vancouver Olympics was confirmed. My home country, Korea, was in the running to but they lost the bid. But hey, I m in Vancouver, and I get to enjoy the benefits of it, so it s all good for me. &#8230; &#8211; More &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It s been a few years since the 2010 Vancouver Olympics was confirmed. My home country, Korea, was in the running to but they lost the bid. But hey, I m in Vancouver, and I get to enjoy the benefits of it, so it s all good for me. &#8230; &#8211; More &#8211; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackYing</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2444</link>
		<author>JackYing</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2444</guid>
					<description>I believe that it is an eventuality that the Gastown and Chinatown areas will be redeveloped. We are running out of room downtown and projects such as Woodward's,not forgetting the marketing genius of Bob Rennie, will make it profitable and attractive for developers to consider that area. Think of this, I currently have 6 assignments in the 2 Woodward's buildings. The prices range from almost $700/sqft with a 10 year leased parking to over $1000/sqft. Developers see this kind of money in an area where they can buy properties to develop at a lower cost and they cannot resist. More and more developments will come up and guess what, the 'undesirable elements' will move away. Why? Not because they will be dragged away by cops but because they shun attention. They live in the shadows of society and when a big spotlight is pointed at them, they will move. I will not enter the discussion of human rights and welfare but that is my opinion of what will happen in that neighborhood. The Olympic Games may force the politicians to accelerate this process though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that it is an eventuality that the Gastown and Chinatown areas will be redeveloped. We are running out of room downtown and projects such as Woodward&#8217;s,not forgetting the marketing genius of Bob Rennie, will make it profitable and attractive for developers to consider that area. Think of this, I currently have 6 assignments in the 2 Woodward&#8217;s buildings. The prices range from almost $700/sqft with a 10 year leased parking to over $1000/sqft. Developers see this kind of money in an area where they can buy properties to develop at a lower cost and they cannot resist. More and more developments will come up and guess what, the &#8216;undesirable elements&#8217; will move away. Why? Not because they will be dragged away by cops but because they shun attention. They live in the shadows of society and when a big spotlight is pointed at them, they will move. I will not enter the discussion of human rights and welfare but that is my opinion of what will happen in that neighborhood. The Olympic Games may force the politicians to accelerate this process though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian gregson</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2510</link>
		<author>ian gregson</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2510</guid>
					<description>Jeff you fail to make one vital connection - what or where do all the people you refer go after the gentrification of their homes ? Do you simply ship them off to another part of the city ? Or do you provide funding to give them adequate housing ? Either way their issues cannot be eliminated simply by renovating their building and puttng them out on the streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff you fail to make one vital connection - what or where do all the people you refer go after the gentrification of their homes ? Do you simply ship them off to another part of the city ? Or do you provide funding to give them adequate housing ? Either way their issues cannot be eliminated simply by renovating their building and puttng them out on the streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kee</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2514</link>
		<author>Jeff Kee</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2514</guid>
					<description>To be honest with you Greg, I don't believe in that much welfare. 

I don't want a single penny spent on re-locating them UNLESS it will get rid of them from the city for good. 

Some kind of a labour camp/rehab would be good. That thing you mentioned once (I think it was you) about how Atlanta managed to clean out the city by deporting them - very tempting for me. 

It's my tax dollars. They didn't pay into the pool. I don't understand how so many upper-class white people and other social activists think that everybody should be guranteed a certain standard of life regardless of how they have lived? For all I care, I wouldn't spare a piece of bread if I saw one dying on teh streets from hunger. 

I'd rather donate that to Africa - where they got raped by the global corporate injustice and now live in a world of povery which is largely dependent upon the global import/export scheme, as well as the currency exchange system which is essentially there to keep the disparity of wealth and poor between different nations. 

They're the ones who ended up in that situation without much of a choice. Not the people on Hastings/Main. An $8/hour (which is minimum wage, I'm sure you know) job can get them help. 

And of course there's the argument for the 10%(or whatever the figure may be) of homeless people or so that were actually born with mental disabilities or so - we can't tell the difference, and we can't justify helping the whole lot so that we don't sacrifice the few who didn't have a choice. In any case. Shit happens, and some people are born with disabilities which hinder their ability to survive and that's how it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest with you Greg, I don&#8217;t believe in that much welfare. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want a single penny spent on re-locating them UNLESS it will get rid of them from the city for good. </p>
<p>Some kind of a labour camp/rehab would be good. That thing you mentioned once (I think it was you) about how Atlanta managed to clean out the city by deporting them - very tempting for me. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s my tax dollars. They didn&#8217;t pay into the pool. I don&#8217;t understand how so many upper-class white people and other social activists think that everybody should be guranteed a certain standard of life regardless of how they have lived? For all I care, I wouldn&#8217;t spare a piece of bread if I saw one dying on teh streets from hunger. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather donate that to Africa - where they got raped by the global corporate injustice and now live in a world of povery which is largely dependent upon the global import/export scheme, as well as the currency exchange system which is essentially there to keep the disparity of wealth and poor between different nations. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re the ones who ended up in that situation without much of a choice. Not the people on Hastings/Main. An $8/hour (which is minimum wage, I&#8217;m sure you know) job can get them help. </p>
<p>And of course there&#8217;s the argument for the 10%(or whatever the figure may be) of homeless people or so that were actually born with mental disabilities or so - we can&#8217;t tell the difference, and we can&#8217;t justify helping the whole lot so that we don&#8217;t sacrifice the few who didn&#8217;t have a choice. In any case. Shit happens, and some people are born with disabilities which hinder their ability to survive and that&#8217;s how it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian gregson</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2523</link>
		<author>ian gregson</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2523</guid>
					<description>Jeff you are seriously over generalising to fit your own argument. There are a thousand different reasons why people end up living on the downtown east side. You simply  cannot generalise and simplify the situation to suit your own ends.

The reasons the downtown eastside exsists as a the poorest postal code in Canada are complex. However, regardless of why it is exists it is up to the rest of us to take responsibility for its existence rather than wanting to move it somewhere else out of view. A truly responsible society takes care of all its members not just those who have some level of affluence. Just because you and I have done well since immigrating to Canada does not give us the right to villify others that have not done so.

We must work together to remove the root causes of drug addiction, the four pillars approach is one of the most innovative methods that Canada has come up with.

I believe in a federally regulated guaranteed annual income for all Canadian citizens. We as working individuals need to demand that our taxes go to more than overly ambitious public-private partnerships such as the 2010 Olympics.

Did you know that Hastings between Cambie and Main used to be the "Robson Street" of Vancouver when Robson Street was still a dirt road ? It has only been in the last 25 years that Robson has risen to prominence as a commercial district.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff you are seriously over generalising to fit your own argument. There are a thousand different reasons why people end up living on the downtown east side. You simply  cannot generalise and simplify the situation to suit your own ends.</p>
<p>The reasons the downtown eastside exsists as a the poorest postal code in Canada are complex. However, regardless of why it is exists it is up to the rest of us to take responsibility for its existence rather than wanting to move it somewhere else out of view. A truly responsible society takes care of all its members not just those who have some level of affluence. Just because you and I have done well since immigrating to Canada does not give us the right to villify others that have not done so.</p>
<p>We must work together to remove the root causes of drug addiction, the four pillars approach is one of the most innovative methods that Canada has come up with.</p>
<p>I believe in a federally regulated guaranteed annual income for all Canadian citizens. We as working individuals need to demand that our taxes go to more than overly ambitious public-private partnerships such as the 2010 Olympics.</p>
<p>Did you know that Hastings between Cambie and Main used to be the &#8220;Robson Street&#8221; of Vancouver when Robson Street was still a dirt road ? It has only been in the last 25 years that Robson has risen to prominence as a commercial district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kee</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2528</link>
		<author>Jeff Kee</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2528</guid>
					<description>Hey ian, 

before i go further I'd like to comment that you're probably one of the more intelligent and proactive individuals I've met. Unlike that other Jessica bitch we saw on the Facebook group (where this all stemmed from) your arguments are valid, respectable. Whereas Jessica, I felt, was one of those unrealistic dreamy upper-class canadian trying to sound all humanitarian by being so freakin sweet etc.. kinda like that dumb woman from New Orleans who refused to leave with the evacuation team unless she coudl bring her dogs. Give me a break!!!

Anyhow. 

Federally regulated income - I don't agree. Some people are not fit to survive and that's the law of nature as far as i'm concerned. 

As for drug addiction campaigns - I agree. But most peopel who are already tehre are too late to get out of it. Education for those under 20 who still have the Y split ahead of them are the ones who do need to be targeted. 

I've personally seen a friend (well, semi-quasi ex-gf sorta woman) turn from a wild child to a homeless person. I've seen the dynamics and psychology of those who are.. well. beyond help, beyond return. I know the Led Zeppelin song goes "there's always time to change the road you're on" but that's a rarity, and I don't see justification to pour that much resources on them. 


Education and proper guidance to the future generation is what will solve this problem in the long run. I also support creating a city environment where it's very difficult to survive without a proper lifestyle and a job - it will motivate more people to live a "proper" life. 

I support our tax funds going into drug-busting. Hells Angels must go, really. 

But then, I must make the point - compared to other places in the world, canada's very very very very easy to succeed in. And I say that because I've lived outside of Canada most of my life! I've seen a tough world to make money in. I've seen a society where people try adn try but because of the lack of resources they can't make it. Insurance frauds by getting hit by cars, suicide and such were so common in Korea, espeically druing the depression that happened in 1997 and spread all across asia. 

As much as I may come across as a cold-hearted bastard, I'm not. I do believe in creating a world where corporates create a good balance with the people and the ecosystem. I do believe in creating a world with less crimes, less drugs, less beatings, less pollution. 

I personally will never drive a large car, ever, unless it ran on electricity, or if I ended up in trades where I need to haul luggage (which i probabliy wont..).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey ian, </p>
<p>before i go further I&#8217;d like to comment that you&#8217;re probably one of the more intelligent and proactive individuals I&#8217;ve met. Unlike that other Jessica bitch we saw on the Facebook group (where this all stemmed from) your arguments are valid, respectable. Whereas Jessica, I felt, was one of those unrealistic dreamy upper-class canadian trying to sound all humanitarian by being so freakin sweet etc.. kinda like that dumb woman from New Orleans who refused to leave with the evacuation team unless she coudl bring her dogs. Give me a break!!!</p>
<p>Anyhow. </p>
<p>Federally regulated income - I don&#8217;t agree. Some people are not fit to survive and that&#8217;s the law of nature as far as i&#8217;m concerned. </p>
<p>As for drug addiction campaigns - I agree. But most peopel who are already tehre are too late to get out of it. Education for those under 20 who still have the Y split ahead of them are the ones who do need to be targeted. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve personally seen a friend (well, semi-quasi ex-gf sorta woman) turn from a wild child to a homeless person. I&#8217;ve seen the dynamics and psychology of those who are.. well. beyond help, beyond return. I know the Led Zeppelin song goes &#8220;there&#8217;s always time to change the road you&#8217;re on&#8221; but that&#8217;s a rarity, and I don&#8217;t see justification to pour that much resources on them. </p>
<p>Education and proper guidance to the future generation is what will solve this problem in the long run. I also support creating a city environment where it&#8217;s very difficult to survive without a proper lifestyle and a job - it will motivate more people to live a &#8220;proper&#8221; life. </p>
<p>I support our tax funds going into drug-busting. Hells Angels must go, really. </p>
<p>But then, I must make the point - compared to other places in the world, canada&#8217;s very very very very easy to succeed in. And I say that because I&#8217;ve lived outside of Canada most of my life! I&#8217;ve seen a tough world to make money in. I&#8217;ve seen a society where people try adn try but because of the lack of resources they can&#8217;t make it. Insurance frauds by getting hit by cars, suicide and such were so common in Korea, espeically druing the depression that happened in 1997 and spread all across asia. </p>
<p>As much as I may come across as a cold-hearted bastard, I&#8217;m not. I do believe in creating a world where corporates create a good balance with the people and the ecosystem. I do believe in creating a world with less crimes, less drugs, less beatings, less pollution. </p>
<p>I personally will never drive a large car, ever, unless it ran on electricity, or if I ended up in trades where I need to haul luggage (which i probabliy wont..).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackYing</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2548</link>
		<author>JackYing</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2548</guid>
					<description>I just can't resist this debate. So I'll jump right in. Coming from a country like Singapore; which is basically a dictatorship disguised as a democracy; to the United States and Canada, where personal freedom and rights are paramount, I have come to the conclusion that everything comes at a price. There is no perfect system. We have to give up something to get some other thing. So it comes down to what is more important to us individually. In the west, we get to express that individuality, somethimes to an extent that I think crosses the line of being good citizens. Just as the government has a responsibility to govern, the people living in that country has the responsibility to obey the laws. But governments anchored by the yoke of politics do not act in the best interests of its citizens just as governments which can dictate the actions of its people run the risk of leading them right over the edge of the cliff.

Take the criminal justice system for example. In Singapore, first time drug traffickers get the death penalty. The repeat offenders percentage is zero. The principle is they would rather have 9 innocent guys in prison than to let that one guilty one go free. In the west it is the exact opposite. 9 guilty criminal go free just so we can prevent the one innocent guy from being punished. In either scenario, there are sad and infuriating instances of injustice. Just depends on which you would prefer.

I think that for myself, since I have chosen to be Canadian, I will accept the pros and cons of this system. I understand it is not perfect and the roots of the problems are extremely deep and often very emotional, especially when it comes to sensitive issues like human rights, unions, the justice system, environment, health care, etc. I believe that I have a better chance of obtaining that so called 'American Dream' here than in Singapore. I believe that in the West, we live to enjoy life, not just to get through life working to pay for material things. I took the family on a shopping trip to Washington on a weekday last week. In Singapore? Ya right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t resist this debate. So I&#8217;ll jump right in. Coming from a country like Singapore; which is basically a dictatorship disguised as a democracy; to the United States and Canada, where personal freedom and rights are paramount, I have come to the conclusion that everything comes at a price. There is no perfect system. We have to give up something to get some other thing. So it comes down to what is more important to us individually. In the west, we get to express that individuality, somethimes to an extent that I think crosses the line of being good citizens. Just as the government has a responsibility to govern, the people living in that country has the responsibility to obey the laws. But governments anchored by the yoke of politics do not act in the best interests of its citizens just as governments which can dictate the actions of its people run the risk of leading them right over the edge of the cliff.</p>
<p>Take the criminal justice system for example. In Singapore, first time drug traffickers get the death penalty. The repeat offenders percentage is zero. The principle is they would rather have 9 innocent guys in prison than to let that one guilty one go free. In the west it is the exact opposite. 9 guilty criminal go free just so we can prevent the one innocent guy from being punished. In either scenario, there are sad and infuriating instances of injustice. Just depends on which you would prefer.</p>
<p>I think that for myself, since I have chosen to be Canadian, I will accept the pros and cons of this system. I understand it is not perfect and the roots of the problems are extremely deep and often very emotional, especially when it comes to sensitive issues like human rights, unions, the justice system, environment, health care, etc. I believe that I have a better chance of obtaining that so called &#8216;American Dream&#8217; here than in Singapore. I believe that in the West, we live to enjoy life, not just to get through life working to pay for material things. I took the family on a shopping trip to Washington on a weekday last week. In Singapore? Ya right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian gregson</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2765</link>
		<author>ian gregson</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-2765</guid>
					<description>Jack - if you are looking for the American dream in Vancouver, hmmm, you might need to go south somewhat. Although we may be annexed sometime soon.

What is the cost of your dream ? To drive around in an Escalade, polluting the environment or to make the world better than when you arrived.

To some people driving around in an Escalade or Hummer is all they need to realise the American dream. Some of us think the American dream is what is causing this global catastophe.

If the American dream means SUV and being an over weight chubby who easts fast food morning , noon and night then count me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack - if you are looking for the American dream in Vancouver, hmmm, you might need to go south somewhat. Although we may be annexed sometime soon.</p>
<p>What is the cost of your dream ? To drive around in an Escalade, polluting the environment or to make the world better than when you arrived.</p>
<p>To some people driving around in an Escalade or Hummer is all they need to realise the American dream. Some of us think the American dream is what is causing this global catastophe.</p>
<p>If the American dream means SUV and being an over weight chubby who easts fast food morning , noon and night then count me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kee</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3225</link>
		<author>Jeff Kee</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3225</guid>
					<description>The original "American Dream" was a world where your efforts and hard work was rewarded properly and proportionately, isntead of bieng taxed 50% once you make over $100,000 a year. It's a joke. But oh well. The original American dream was to be able to self-sustain your family through legitimate means of hard and smart work, isntead of living in a place where there are no opportunities, everybody makes roughly the same, with no incentive to be better tahn others - AKA a communist society. 

If we are to reward those who make the effort, we cannot reward those who didn't. they should be punished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original &#8220;American Dream&#8221; was a world where your efforts and hard work was rewarded properly and proportionately, isntead of bieng taxed 50% once you make over $100,000 a year. It&#8217;s a joke. But oh well. The original American dream was to be able to self-sustain your family through legitimate means of hard and smart work, isntead of living in a place where there are no opportunities, everybody makes roughly the same, with no incentive to be better tahn others - AKA a communist society. </p>
<p>If we are to reward those who make the effort, we cannot reward those who didn&#8217;t. they should be punished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian gregson</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3226</link>
		<author>ian gregson</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3226</guid>
					<description>What we consume is what is largely responsible for killing the planet. All those cars, planes, plastic bags, big screen tv's, computers, all come from somewhere - they do not magically appear on the store shelves.

What is the incentive to make more money if it is only to consume more and therefore degrade the planet even more ?

I make an effort to save the planet everyday, I don't own a car, I don't own a house [I live in a co-op].

The rewards I seek are to preserve this planet for future generations, however if we continue as you suggest I believe we will be killing our future generations; at the very least subjecting them to extreme conditions that make our lives heavenly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we consume is what is largely responsible for killing the planet. All those cars, planes, plastic bags, big screen tv&#8217;s, computers, all come from somewhere - they do not magically appear on the store shelves.</p>
<p>What is the incentive to make more money if it is only to consume more and therefore degrade the planet even more ?</p>
<p>I make an effort to save the planet everyday, I don&#8217;t own a car, I don&#8217;t own a house [I live in a co-op].</p>
<p>The rewards I seek are to preserve this planet for future generations, however if we continue as you suggest I believe we will be killing our future generations; at the very least subjecting them to extreme conditions that make our lives heavenly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackYing</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3618</link>
		<author>JackYing</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3618</guid>
					<description>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "The American Dream is a subjective term usually implying a successful and satisfying life. Perceptions of the American dream are usually framed in terms of American capitalism, its associated purported meritocracy, and the freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Bill of Rights. The term is not easily defined, and has subjective meaning to many who claim it. The term is used by many modern Americans to signify success in life as a result of hard work (as in, "living [or pursuing] the American Dream")."
Ian, most of us came to this country as immigrants for one reason or another. We have different opinions about various issues and that is what make us unique individuals and this country great. I appreciate your concern with the future of the planet and applaud your efforts to preserve it for our children. What I do not appreciate is your assumption that my idea of 'the American Dream' is materialistic. You conveniently used a term I used to describe the freedoms Canada and the US guarantees all its citizens to label all the negative by-products of a capitalistic society. I suggest when you respond to someone's comment, you stick to the subject and not twist it around so you can bring your perspectives on some other issues into the spotlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: &#8220;The American Dream is a subjective term usually implying a successful and satisfying life. Perceptions of the American dream are usually framed in terms of American capitalism, its associated purported meritocracy, and the freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Bill of Rights. The term is not easily defined, and has subjective meaning to many who claim it. The term is used by many modern Americans to signify success in life as a result of hard work (as in, &#8220;living [or pursuing] the American Dream&#8221;).&#8221;<br />
Ian, most of us came to this country as immigrants for one reason or another. We have different opinions about various issues and that is what make us unique individuals and this country great. I appreciate your concern with the future of the planet and applaud your efforts to preserve it for our children. What I do not appreciate is your assumption that my idea of &#8216;the American Dream&#8217; is materialistic. You conveniently used a term I used to describe the freedoms Canada and the US guarantees all its citizens to label all the negative by-products of a capitalistic society. I suggest when you respond to someone&#8217;s comment, you stick to the subject and not twist it around so you can bring your perspectives on some other issues into the spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loolund</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3935</link>
		<author>loolund</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-3935</guid>
					<description>Well, I certainly agree that Olympics or not the downtown Eastside is threatened.  The way I see it is that back in the eighties, when the govn't of the day shut the doors of Riverview to all but the most desperate cases and sent the rest of the patients out to group homes was the beginning of the end.  The DTES has always had a reputation, but how could a small city (as Vancouver was in the eighties) cope with the influx of group home drop-outs/kicked-out patients who refused to take their meds for all sorts of reasons (some valid some not).  Before people could really manage to deal with this, Ontario and Alberta began to ship their welfare recipients off to the DTES.  Want to get a picture - volunteer at a soup kitchen and ask the patrons where they are from (pre-nineties).  It will amaze you how few are actually locals.  I think Vancouver and BC are responsible for the patient they kicked out and lower mainland natives, but no one else.  Am I heartless, no, I think the solution is for welfare recipients to return to their native provinces to pick up a welfare check.  That would at least give BC a handle on how many homeless they can cope with. then get mad if they don't.  Right now, Olympics or not B.C. cannot provide welfare to ALL of Canada's down and out; nor can Vancouver cope with ALL of BC's down and out.  

Check out London England for an idea of what happens when you attempt to give social housing to the poor, the system overloads, some poor get everything, raise their kids to live on dole and others get nothing (on a waitlist), the situation staggered London, and they got rid of all social housing in return for fair (market value) rent supplements welfare recipients ( but, the Recipient had to be Londoners - born or immigrated to the place).  

So a fair question is, why should Vancouver have to subsidize housing for non-locals or out-of-province people who just choose the most expensive city in Canada?  I personally am not able to afford a SFH in decent condition in Vancouver, so I live in the burbs, why should some who is not raised here get that privilage, there are many more affordable places to live.  Reality is: beggars can't be choosers.  Somehow, I don't feel this is unfair or heartless, just what we all live with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I certainly agree that Olympics or not the downtown Eastside is threatened.  The way I see it is that back in the eighties, when the govn&#8217;t of the day shut the doors of Riverview to all but the most desperate cases and sent the rest of the patients out to group homes was the beginning of the end.  The DTES has always had a reputation, but how could a small city (as Vancouver was in the eighties) cope with the influx of group home drop-outs/kicked-out patients who refused to take their meds for all sorts of reasons (some valid some not).  Before people could really manage to deal with this, Ontario and Alberta began to ship their welfare recipients off to the DTES.  Want to get a picture - volunteer at a soup kitchen and ask the patrons where they are from (pre-nineties).  It will amaze you how few are actually locals.  I think Vancouver and BC are responsible for the patient they kicked out and lower mainland natives, but no one else.  Am I heartless, no, I think the solution is for welfare recipients to return to their native provinces to pick up a welfare check.  That would at least give BC a handle on how many homeless they can cope with. then get mad if they don&#8217;t.  Right now, Olympics or not B.C. cannot provide welfare to ALL of Canada&#8217;s down and out; nor can Vancouver cope with ALL of BC&#8217;s down and out.  </p>
<p>Check out London England for an idea of what happens when you attempt to give social housing to the poor, the system overloads, some poor get everything, raise their kids to live on dole and others get nothing (on a waitlist), the situation staggered London, and they got rid of all social housing in return for fair (market value) rent supplements welfare recipients ( but, the Recipient had to be Londoners - born or immigrated to the place).  </p>
<p>So a fair question is, why should Vancouver have to subsidize housing for non-locals or out-of-province people who just choose the most expensive city in Canada?  I personally am not able to afford a SFH in decent condition in Vancouver, so I live in the burbs, why should some who is not raised here get that privilage, there are many more affordable places to live.  Reality is: beggars can&#8217;t be choosers.  Somehow, I don&#8217;t feel this is unfair or heartless, just what we all live with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kee&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Sea-To-Sky Corridor and its development</title>
		<link>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-6778</link>
		<author>Jeff Kee&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Sea-To-Sky Corridor and its development</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jeffkee.com/2007/03/28/2010-vancouver-winter-olympic-homeless-people-developers-real-estate-vandalism/#comment-6778</guid>
					<description>[...] The Sea-To-Sky Corridor and its development April 30th, 2007 by Jeff Kee   - Related Posts -5 of many of the reasons why I think the Vancouver Real Estate Market is still goodA one day pause of posts&#8230;2010 Vancouver Olympics, and the two faces of the city [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Sea-To-Sky Corridor and its development April 30th, 2007 by Jeff Kee   - Related Posts -5 of many of the reasons why I think the Vancouver Real Estate Market is still goodA one day pause of posts&#8230;2010 Vancouver Olympics, and the two faces of the city [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
